🔗 Share this article

One year ago, the landscape was entirely separate. Ahead of the national election, reflective citizens could acknowledge the country's deep flaws – its inequities and imbalance – yet they still could identify it as the US. A free society. A country where the rule of law held significance. A country led by a dignified and decent leader, notwithstanding his elderly years and declining health.

These days, in late October 2025, many of us barely recognize the country we live in. Individuals believed to be undocumented migrants are collected and shoved into vehicles, sometimes refused legal rights. The eastern section of the White House – is undergoing demolition to build a lavish ballroom. The leader is harassing his political rivals or supposed enemies and demanding federal prosecutors surrender an enormous amount of public funds. Armed military personnel are being sent across metropolitan centers under fabricated reasons. The defense headquarters, rebranded the Defense Ministry, has effectively liberated itself of routine media oversight while it uses what could amount to nearly $1tn of taxpayer money. Universities, legal practices, news companies are submitting from leader's menaces, and billionaires are treated like nobility.

“America, only a few months ahead of its quarter-millennium anniversary as the world’s leading democracy, has tipped over the limit into autocracy and extremism,” an American historian, stated this past summer. “In the end, swifter than I thought feasible, it occurred in this country.”

Each day begins with fresh terrors. And it's challenging to understand – and painful to realize – how severely declined our nation is, and how quickly it occurred.

Nevertheless, we know that the president was properly voted in. Despite his profoundly alarming previous administration and even after the cautions associated with the knowledge of the rightwing blueprint – despite the president personally stated openly he intended to rule as a tyrant only on the first day – enough Americans selected him over the other candidate.

While alarming as today's circumstances is, it's more daunting to recognize that we’re only nine months under this leadership. Where will an additional three years of this deterioration find us? And suppose that period turns into something even longer, as there is not anyone to stop this leader from determining that additional tenure is essential, perhaps for security concerns?

Certainly, all is not lost. There are midterm elections next year that could establish an alternate balance of power, should Democrats recapture one or both houses of the legislature. We have elected officials who are striving to apply certain responsibility, such as representatives currently initiating an inquiry regarding the effort to fund seizure from the justice department.

And a presidential election in the next cycle could initiate us down the road toward restoration exactly as last year’s election placed us on this disappointing trajectory.

There are countless citizens marching in urban areas throughout communities, similar to recent recently during anti-authority protests.

An ex-cabinet member, stated lately that “the dormant powerhouse of the nation is awakening”, exactly as before following the Red Scare in the 1950s or amid anti-war demonstrations or during the Watergate scandal.

In those instances, the listing ship finally returned to balance.

Reich says he recognizes the signals of that awakening and sees it happening at present. For proof, he points to the large-scale demonstrations, the broad, multi-faction opposition to a television host's removal and the almost universal defiance by media to sign government requirements they only publish approved content.

“The dormant force consistently stays dormant before some venality grows too toxic, a particular deed so offensive toward public welfare, certain violence so noisy, that it is compelled other than to stir.”

It's a hopeful perspective, and I value his knowledgeable stance. Perhaps he will be validated.

At the same time, the major inquiries persist: is the US able to return to normalcy? Can it reclaim its status globally and its adherence to legal principles?

Or should we recognize that the national endeavor functioned for a period, and then – swiftly, totally – ended?

My cynical mind tells me that the final scenario is true; that everything could be lost. My positive feelings, nevertheless, advises me that we have to attempt, in whatever ways possible.

In my case, as a media critic, that’s about encouraging reporters to commit, more completely, to their purpose of scrutinizing authority. For different individuals, it may be participating in election efforts, or organizing rallies, or finding ways to protect voting rights.

Less than a year ago, we lived in a very different place. In the future? Or after another term? The reality is, we don’t know. All we can do is to attempt to not give up.

What Provides Me Optimism Currently

The contact I experience with students with young journalists, who are equally hopeful and practical, {always