🔗 Share this article

The UN Security Council has adopted a American-supported resolution that endorses Moroccan claim regarding the disputed territory, despite strong resistance from neighboring Algeria.

Divided Decision Bolsters Morocco's Stance

Although the recent vote was split, the measure constitutes the strongest support to date for Morocco's plan to maintain control over the region, which additionally has support from the majority of EU members and a increasing number of African allies.

Resolution Structure and Key Components

The document describes Morocco's plan as a foundation for negotiation. As with earlier resolutions, the document makes no mention of a referendum on independence that contains sovereignty as an choice, which represents the solution traditionally favored by the pro-independence Polisario movement and its allies.

Real autonomy under Moroccan sovereignty could represent a most practical solution.

Background Information

Western Sahara is a phosphate-rich area of coastline desert the size of a US state which was under Spanish control until the mid-1970s. It is asserted by both the Moroccan government and the Polisario movement, which functions from refugee camps in southwestern neighboring Algeria and asserts to speak for the indigenous people native to the contested region.

Decision Patterns and International Reactions

The US, which proposed the resolution, guided eleven nations in deciding in favor, while three nations – multiple nations – abstained. The neighboring country, the movement's main benefactor, did not vote.

Mike Waltz, the US ambassador to the UN, said the vote had been "historic" and would "build on the momentum for a long, long overdue peace in Western Sahara".

The Algerian ambassador, the Algeria's ambassador to the United Nations, said that while the resolution was an advancement on previous iterations, it "contains a number of shortcomings".

Security Mission and Future Assessment

The resolution also renews the United Nations peacekeeping mission in Western Sahara for an additional twelve months, as has been done for over three decades. Previous extensions, however, have not contained a reference to Morocco and its supporters' favored outcome.

The measure calls on all parties participating to "take this unprecedented opportunity for a enduring resolution." Depending on progress, it asks the UN leader to review the operation's authority within half a year.

Area Consequences and Current Conditions

The change could unsettle a long-stalled situation that for decades has escaped resolution, desdespite a UN security operation that was intended to be short-term. Demonstrations have ensued in indigenous settlements in the neighboring country this week, where people have pledged not to give up their struggle for independence.

The Moroccan government controls nearly all of the territory, except for a narrow strip known as the "liberated area" that lies east of a Moroccan-built barrier.

Historical Context and Current Developments

A 1991-era ceasefire was intended to pave the way for a vote on independence, but fighting over voter eligibility blocked it from taking place.

Through time, Morocco has developed the disputed region, building a deepwater port and a long highway. State subsidies keep basic commodity prices low, and the population has grown significantly as Moroccans settle in cities such as Dakhla and Laayoune.

The movement withdrew from the truce in 2020 after confrontations near a route Morocco was paving to neighboring Mauritania.

The group has subsequently regularly documented military operations, while Morocco has primarily denied open conflict. The United Nations describes it "low-level tensions".

International Relations and Coming Prospects

Reacting to the draft resolution, the movement said that it would not participate in any process intending "to 'legitimise' Morocco's illegal presence," adding peace "cannot happen by supporting expansionism".

The conflict represents the central issue in regional diplomacy. The Moroccan government views support for its autonomy plan as a standard for how it assesses its allies.

Last October, the UN envoy suggested dividing Western Sahara, a proposal neither side agreed to. He encouraged the government to clarify what self-rule would involve and cautioned that a lack of development might raise questions about the United Nations' function and "if there remains opportunity and willingness for us to remain effective."

The initiative to reassess the UN operation comes as the United States slashes funding for UN programmes and agencies, covering peacekeeping.